88 facts, every one sourced
Every fact on this site in one list, each linked to its source. Our build stores the source text and checks that the key words and figures in each fact really appear in it; see the sources page.
- 1 In February 2015 one photo split the internet: was the dress blue with black lace, or white with gold lace? WIRED
- 3 It has nothing to do with colour blindness. Michael Bach
- 4 The colour of a non-glowing thing like a dress depends on two things: the colour of the light falling on it, and how its material reflects each colour of light. Michael Bach
- 5 Your visual system tries to work out the colour of the light and ‘subtract’ it. This is called colour constancy, and it usually works well. Michael Bach
- 6 That is why a photo taken on a glacier at noon can look surprisingly blue when you look at it at home. Michael Bach
- 7 Bach blames a poor photo: badly lit, overexposed on one side and showing only the dress, so the brain has too little to go on when it guesses the light. Michael Bach
- 8 Colour names play a part too: a bright, bluish colour counts as ‘white’ for some people and ‘blue’ for others. Michael Bach
- 9 Look at two stripes through small holes, cut off from the rest of the picture, and the argument mostly goes away: both sides tend to see brownish and light bluish. Michael Bach
- 10 It has been called the ‘Necker cube of colour vision’: two readings are about equally likely, but unlike the Necker cube it is hard to flip between them yourself. Michael Bach
- 11 Bach’s answer to the real colours, well lit with white light: black and blue. Michael Bach
- 12 WIRED’s verdict in 2015: the dress is blue. WIRED
- 13 Neuroscientist Bevil Conway ran the pixels through Photoshop and decided the dress was actually blue and orange. WIRED
- 14 Conway, of Wellesley College, suggested that people discount either the blue end or the gold end of daylight’s colours, and so see white and gold or blue and black. WIRED
- 15 Daylight itself changes colour, from pinkish red at dawn to blue-white at noon and back to reddish at twilight. WIRED
- 16 Jay Neitz, who saw white and gold, said that in 30 years of studying colour vision it was one of the biggest individual differences he had ever seen. WIRED
- 17 Pixels that some people saw as gold measured R 93, G 76, B 50: on their own, a kind of orange. WIRED
- 18 Conway joked that night owls might be more likely to see blue and black. WIRED
- 19 Akiyoshi Kitaoka’s famous picture shows a strawberry tartlet with a blue-green tint, and yet the strawberries still look red. Michael Bach
- 20 There is not a single red, or even reddish, pixel in it. Michael Bach
- 21 Mask off just the ‘reddest’ parts and the red mostly disappears. Michael Bach
- 22 Swap the strawberries for ovals of the same colours and the ovals still look reddish, so it isn’t only that we know strawberries are red. Michael Bach
- 23 Expectation does play some part: there is evidence that it affects colour perception to some degree. Michael Bach
- 24 Kitaoka made it in 2015, and Bach calls it a strong demonstration of colour constancy. Michael Bach
- 25 The mostly green-blue picture shifts what your eye takes as white, so grey and white areas look reddish. Michael Bach
- 26 In 1824 the chemist Michel-Eugène Chevreul became director of dyeing at the Gobelins tapestry works, and soon got complaints that the colours looked dull. Britannica
- 27 He found the problem was not chemical but optical. Britannica
- 28 His law of simultaneous contrast: colours placed side by side affect each other, each pushing its own complementary colour onto its neighbour. Britannica
- 29 He set it out in 1839 in his most influential book, The Laws of Contrast of Colour. Britannica
- 30 He described ways to get colour effects, such as massed dots of single colours. Britannica
- 31 He arranged all the colours of the spectrum in a circle to show how they relate. Britannica
- 32 Before all that, he patented a new kind of candle, made with stearic acid from fat, in 1825. Britannica
- 33 In Bach’s eye demo, a grey eye with a red tint around it looks bluish, while the identical grey eye on the other side looks neutral. Michael Bach
- 34 The reddish surround pushes the grey towards its opposite colour, which for red is blue-green. Michael Bach
- 35 Bach calls it simultaneous colour contrast, probably helped by colour adaptation. Michael Bach
- 36 In Ted Adelson’s checker shadow, a square in the shadow of a cylinder looks brighter than a square outside it. Michael Bach
- 37 In fact the two squares have identical luminance: the same amount of light comes from each. Michael Bach
- 38 Our eyes are not light meters: they take context into account. Michael Bach
- 39 Your brain estimates the lighting and judges the material: is this a light or a dark square, whatever the shadow? Michael Bach
- 40 Adelson published it in 1995. Michael Bach
- 41 In White’s illusion, identical bars look different in brightness depending on which stripes they sit on. Michael Bach
- 42 Michael White described it in 1979 and 1981. Michael Bach
- 43 Lateral inhibition, the usual explanation for contrast effects, predicts the opposite of what you see. Michael Bach
- 44 Mach bands: where dark ramps up to light, you see a bright band at the top of the ramp and a darker band at the bottom that are not really there. Michael Bach
- 45 They have been known since 1865. Michael Bach
- 46 They appear where a gradient of brightness, or colour, bends. Michael Bach
- 47 In Bach’s assimilation demo three discs behind coloured grids look cyan, magenta and yellow, but all three are white (strictly, a light yellow). Michael Bach
- 48 This is assimilation, first described by Bezold: each disc takes on the mixed colour of the lines crossing it. Michael Bach
- 49 Assimilation is the opposite of colour contrast. Michael Bach
- 50 Bach admits he doesn’t understand the brain mechanism behind assimilation. Michael Bach
- 51 One idea, from King in 1988: we see contrast when patches look like separate things, and assimilation when they look like one whole. Michael Bach
- 52 In the Munker illusion two stripes look green and blue, yet there are only three colours in the picture: both stripes are the same green. Michael Bach
- 53 It shows how much the colours around something change how we see it. Michael Bach
- 54 Hans Munker wrote about coloured grids in 1970. Michael Bach
- 55 In the watercolour illusion, shapes edged with a dark wavy line and a lighter coloured line inside look faintly tinted, though the inside is plain white. Michael Bach
- 56 Baingio Pinna discovered it in 1987. Michael Bach
- 57 Even with pale lines the illusory colour is quite strong. Michael Bach
- 58 Bach suspects map colourers knew about it centuries ago. Michael Bach
- 59 Neon colour spreading: a coloured star set inside black lines seems to glow, so it looks a little like a coloured disc. Michael Bach
- 60 Any gap between the coloured and black lines destroys the effect. Michael Bach
- 61 Bach says Van Tuijl was the first to describe it, in 1975. Michael Bach
- 62 Bach’s own reading list starts earlier, with D. Varin’s 1971 Italian paper on contrast and colour spreading. Michael Bach
- 63 It works with greys too. Michael Bach
- 64 An afterimage is an illusion in which the picture on your retina lingers after the thing itself has gone. Britannica
- 65 It can be positive, matching the original, or negative: less bright, or in the complementary colours. Britannica
- 66 A common one is the spot you see after a camera flash. Britannica
- 67 In the lilac chaser, a ring of magenta blobs circles a cross, and one blob at a time briefly disappears. Michael Bach
- 68 Keep your eyes on the cross and you see a green spot running round the ring. Michael Bach
- 69 With a really steady gaze the magenta blobs fade away completely, leaving only the green spot. Michael Bach
- 70 Bach notes that the opposite colour of red is not green, as many textbooks say, but blue-green. Michael Bach
- 71 Its inventor, Jeremy Hinton, says it shows Troxler fading, complementary colours and negative after-effects. Michael Bach
- 72 We normally move our eyes about three times a second, so afterimages rarely build up in everyday life. Michael Bach
- 73 Research has traced the afterimage to retinal ganglion cells, in the eye itself. Michael Bach
- 74 An afterimage normally fades within a few seconds. Michael Bach
- 75 Your brain joins the afterimages, one place after the next, into a single moving green disc. Michael Bach
- 76 The McCollough effect: after a few minutes of looking at coloured stripes, black and white stripes look faintly coloured. Michael Bach
- 77 Most aftereffects last a minute at most. This one can last hours. Michael Bach
- 78 Ten minutes of adapting is said to give an effect lasting months. Michael Bach
- 79 Bach warns that trying it changes your brain for a long time, up to months. Michael Bach
- 80 Benham’s top is a black and white disc that, when it spins, shows faint colours. Michael Bach
- 81 Take a photo of it spinning and the colours are not there. Michael Bach
- 82 Spin it the other way and the colours swap places. Michael Bach
- 83 In 1894 the toy maker Charles E. Benham sold his disc as an ‘Artificial Spectrum Top’. Michael Bach
- 84 Bach says Gustav Fechner was the first to describe the effect, in 1838. Michael Bach
- 85 The psychologist Richard Gregory traced it back further, to a French monk, Benedict Prévost, in 1826. Michael Bach
- 86 Prévost saw colours ‘like a heavenly light’ on his fingers when he waved his hands about in the cloisters. Michael Bach
- 87 The effect was forgotten and rediscovered no fewer than twelve times. Michael Bach
- 88 Nobody knows for certain why the colours appear. Michael Bach